Skip to main content
· 4/27/2010

Passlogix, Inc. v. 2FA TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Citations

  • 708 F. Supp. 2d 378
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44182
  • 2010 WL 1702216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a party is on notice of its preservation duty “at least by the time the complaint is served” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)
  • finding that the plaintiff failed to meet its burden of demonstrating fabrication by clear and convincing evidence where the defendants presented a “colorable counter-narrative,” despite gaps in that counter-narrative
  • imposing a $10,000 fine on defendants for spoliation of evidence to “serve[ ] the dual purposes of deterrence and punishment”
  • imposing a $10,000 sanction against company, payable to the court, based on the party's \litigation conduct\ and \its status as a small corporation\
  • applying factors to determine whether party perpetrated fraud on the court
  • Skype records retrievable from another computer negated prejudice, but description of contents of deleted email did \not supplant the missing document\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.