Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an absurd result militates against a proposed statutory interpretation
• holding that an absurd result militates against a proposed statutory interpretation
• holding that an absurd result militates against a proposed statutory interpretation
• holding that an absurd result militates against a proposed statutory interpretation
• noting that a court may not disregard the statute’s plain language unless a literal application of the statutory language “would lead to absurd results ... or would thwart the obvious purpose of the statute”
• involving preliminary questions of ICC's authority to set Initial rates for the Trans Alaska pipeline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).