Dunlop v. Bachowski
Citations
- 421 U.S. 560
- 95 S. Ct. 1851
- 44 L. Ed. 2d 377
- 1975 U.S. LEXIS 140
About this case
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1975 United States Supreme Court case
Dunlop v. Bachowski, 421 U.S. 560 (1975), is a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 gives federal courts jurisdiction to review decisions of the United States Department of Labor to proceed (or not) with prosecutions under the Act. In this case, there was a disputed election within the United Steelworkers . The Court declined to authorize a jury-type trial into the reasons for the department's decisions, and instead held that court may only review the department's rationales under the "arbitrary and capricious" test.[1]
References
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dunlop_v._Bachowski&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: References")
]
- ↑ Beerman, Jack M. Administrative Law. New York, N.Y.: Aspen Publishers, 2006, p. 37.
External links
[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dunlop_v._Bachowski&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: External links")
]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dunlop_v._Bachowski&oldid=1330670844 "
Hidden categories:
Search
Search
Dunlop v. Bachowski
Add languages Add topic
Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the presumption of reviewability as it relates to APA section 701(a)(1)
- allowed review for abuse of discretion, even though courts could not decide the issue in question
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brennan, Burger, Douglas, Stewart, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.