Udall v. Tallman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a regulation must be interpreted, “a court must necessarily look to the administrative construction of the regulation if the meaning of the words used is in doubt”
• noting that the Supreme Court “gives great deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration”
• noting that the Supreme Court \gives great deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration\
• noting that the Supreme Court “gives great deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration”
• noting that “[w]hen the construction of an administrative regulation rather than a statute is in issue, deference is even more clearly in order”
• noting that this deference is even greater than that afforded an agency’s construction of a statute it administers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).