Skip to main content
· 2/9/1996

Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Surface Transportation Board and the United States of America, West Texas Utilities Company, Intervenor

Citations

  • 75 F.3d 685
  • 316 U.S. App. D.C. 103
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1854

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that petitioner's claim was not moot because it still maintained other contracts likely to be subject to the same agency action and such agency action was actually pending on other contracts
  • stating that “once the responsible agency ... has passed on a contract, transportation proceeds under its terms, free from agency oversight.”
  • applying pre-ICC-TA law to petition for review filed in September, 1994
  • applying pre-ICC-TA law to petition for review filed in September, 1994
  • “[B]oth Supreme Court and circuit precedent hold that orders of less than two years’ duration ordinarily evade review.”
  • “[B]oth Supreme Court and circuit precedent hold that orders of less than two years’ duration ordinarily evade review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley, Williams, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.