Townsend v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f there is evidence allowing the jury to conclude that another party with access did not place the drugs in the vehicle [owned by the defendant], . . . the jury may conclude that the only reasonable hypothesis is that the defendant possessed the drugs.”
• “[i]f there is evidence allowing the jury to conclude that another party with access did not place the drugs in the vehicle [owned by the defendant], . . . the jury may conclude that the only reasonable hypothesis is that the defendant possessed the drugs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pincherli v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-12-31· cited 20×
• Prather v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-08-15· cited 20×
• Bussey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-09-04· cited 18×
• McGee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-09-10· cited 12×
• Woodard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-01-30· cited 11×
• Dalton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-04-29· cited 4×
• Malcolm Jamal Reeves v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-12-24
• Nichols v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-09-17
• Whitlock v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-12-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-01-29· cited 19×
• Moon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-03-09· cited 17×
• Knox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-01-17· cited 16×
• Visser v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-04-28· cited 8×
• Battle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-23· cited 6×
• Bodiford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-11-21· cited 4×