Yamaha Motor Co., U.S.A. v. Arnoult

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that witness was a qualified expert in part because he held “masters and doctoral degrees in industrial engineering with specializations in human factors engineering and ergonomics”
• recognizing that a plaintiff is entitled to damages that are proximately caused by a defendant's negligence
• deciding that when the defendant is the offeree, the court should consider if the defendant's defense was brought in good COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA (0
• deciding that when the defendant is the offeree, the court should consider if the defendant's defense was brought in good COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA (0
• deciding that when the defendant is the offeree, the court should consider if the defendant's defense was brought in good COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA (0
• deciding that when the defendant is the offeree, the court should consider if the defendant's defense was brought in good COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA (0

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).