Nevada Supreme Court· 10/4/1984
Smith v. State
Citations
- 688 P.2d 326
- 100 Nev. 570
- 1984 Nev. LEXIS 427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that expert testimony about family dynamics related to sexual abuse is relevant to help the jury understand “superficially unusual behavior of the victim and her mother”
- holding that expert testimony about family dynamics related to sexual abuse is relevant to help the jury understand \superficially unusual behavior of the victim and her mother\
- Trial court properly admitted expert testimony to explain delays in reporting contact in intrafamily abuse case
- Trial court properly admitted expert testimony to explain delays in reporting contact in intrafamily abuse case
- expert testimony that family members often delay in reporting that the father or father figure has been sexually abusing his children held admissible
- expert testimony that family members often delay in reporting that the father or father figure has been sexually abusing his children held admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-12-07· cited 406×
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-08-30· cited 297×
- Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-10-10· cited 294×
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-04-03· cited 204×
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-14· cited 159×
- Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-06-23· cited 116×
- Townsend v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1987-05-13· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. DockhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-08-21· cited 102×
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-11-30· cited 97×
- Wheat v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-06-11· cited 87×
- Mulder v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2000-01-18· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-31· cited 80×
- Goodson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-07-11· cited 74×
- State v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2003-05-20· cited 73×
- Kruse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-05· cited 66×
- People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-11-24· cited 59×
- Krause Inc. v. LittleNevada Supreme Court· 2001-11-21· cited 52×
- State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-11-14· cited 52×
- State v. LawrenceIdaho Court of Appeals· 1986-12-31· cited 51×
- State v. BrousseauWashington Supreme Court· 2011-08-18· cited 41×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.