Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 688 P.2d 326
  • 100 Nev. 570
  • 1984 Nev. LEXIS 427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that expert testimony about family dynamics related to sexual abuse is relevant to help the jury understand “superficially unusual behavior of the victim and her mother”
  • holding that expert testimony about family dynamics related to sexual abuse is relevant to help the jury understand \superficially unusual behavior of the victim and her mother\
  • Trial court properly admitted expert testimony to explain delays in reporting contact in intrafamily abuse case
  • Trial court properly admitted expert testimony to explain delays in reporting contact in intrafamily abuse case
  • expert testimony that family members often delay in reporting that the father or father figure has been sexually abusing his children held admissible
  • expert testimony that family members often delay in reporting that the father or father figure has been sexually abusing his children held admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.