Wicker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that vaginal, oral, and anal penetration constituted separate offenses, despite the acts occurring close in time to each other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Townsend v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1987-05-13· cited 111×
• Gaxiola v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2005-09-22· cited 80×
• Crowley v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-01-30· cited 51×
• Deeds v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-04-10· cited 27×
• Hicks v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-01-24· cited 8×
• Wicker v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-01-25· cited 6×
• Taylor v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-04-30· cited 5×
• Turner v. Housewright
  D. Nevada· 1984-12-20· cited 3×
• Ortiz v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2024-04-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Slobodion
  California Supreme Court· 1948-03-23· cited 128×
• Dinkens v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1976-01-28· cited 23×
• Hankins v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-07-23· cited 22×
• Hogan v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1968-05-28· cited 20×
• Henderson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-05-09· cited 11×
• Burks v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1976-12-21· cited 6×