D. Minnesota· 10/30/2014
Toomey v. Dahl
Citations
- 63 F. Supp. 3d 982
- 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154804
- 2014 WL 5496617
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The party seeking transfer must show that the balance of factors strongly favors the movant.” (quotation omitted)
- “Section 1404(a) provides for transfer to a more convenient forum, not a forum likely to prove equally convenient.” (quotation omitted)
- applying the heightened standard to Minnesota fraudulent misrepresentation claim
- noting the court’s preference for “live testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ericksen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bae Systems Land & Armaments L.P. v. Ibis Tek, LLCD. Minnesota· 2015-08-19· cited 24×
- Podpeskar v. Makita U.S.A. Inc.D. Minnesota· 2017-03-28· cited 14×
- Goodbye Vanilla, LLC v. Aimia Proprietary Loyalty U.S. Inc.D. Maine· 2018-01-18· cited 6×
- In re Trusts Established Under the Pooling & Servicing Agreements Relating to the Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C30D. Minnesota· 2017-03-14· cited 5×
- Genz-Ryan Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Weyerhaeuser NR Co.D. Maine· 2018-11-09· cited 5×
- Badhwa v. Veritec, Inc.D. Maine· 2018-12-13· cited 2×
- Auge v. Fairchild Equip., Inc.D. Maine· 2019-06-24
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 5,292×
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 4,713×
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 4,319×
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 3,814×
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court· 1977-06-24· cited 2,976×
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,362×
- Terra International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a Mississippi CorporationEighth Circuit· 1997-08-18· cited 347×
- Parnes v. Gateway 2000, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1997-08-08· cited 319×
- George Lambert, D/B/A Rainbow Fruit v. Sam Kysar and Joan Kysar, D/B/A Lewis River Tree FarmFirst Circuit· 1993-01-13· cited 312×
- Pt United Can Company Ltd. v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., F/k/a Continental Can Company Richard Krzyzanowski John W. ConwaySecond Circuit· 1998-02-25· cited 260×
- Dever v. Hentzen CoatingsEighth Circuit· 2004-08-23· cited 257×
- Johnson v. ArdenEighth Circuit· 2010-08-04· cited 247×
- Polizzi v. Cowles Magazines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1953-06-01· cited 236×
- R.E. Wood, Jr. And Julie Wood v. Mid-Valley IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1991-08-14· cited 222×
- Digi-Tel Holdings, Inc. v. Proteq Telecommunications (Pte), Ltd., Brustuen International, Inc., IntervenorEighth Circuit· 1996-07-11· cited 213×
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-09-21· cited 164×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.