Walden v. Fiore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “a nonresident’s physical presence within the territorial jurisdiction of the court is not required” to give rise to specific jurisdiction
• recognizing that “a nonresident’s physical presence within the territorial jurisdiction of the court is not required” to give rise to specific jurisdiction
• holding that the plaintiffs contacts with the forum cannot alone establish contacts by the defendant
• holding that the specific jurisdiction inquiry necessitates a study of the interconnection between the defendant, the forum, and the litigation
• holding that the contact with the forum State must be created by the foreign defendant, as opposed to a third-party
• holding that minimum contacts analysis “looks to the defendant’s contacts with the forum [s]tate itself, not the defendant’s contacts with persons who reside there”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).