Thoyakulathu v. Brennan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that State has “legitimate interest in placing restrictions on the filing of health care liability claims”
• declining to apply thirty-day extension to cure deficiencies in an expert report when the report was not timely served
• applying Walker to reject as-applied challenge to expert-report requirement where claimant had attempted to serve report timely, but fax machine failed; \Section 74.351 need not provide an exception geared toward such misfortune in order to provide constitutionally adequate safeguards.\
• applying Walker to reject as-applied challenge to expert-report requirement where claimant had attempted to serve report timely, but fax machine failed; “Section 74.351 need not provide an exception geared toward such misfortune in order to provide constitutionally adequate safeguards.”
• ordering dismissal when report served late due to facsimile transmission problem
• involving a failed fax transmission in serving an expert report within the 120-day deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).