· 4/13/2009
Offenbach v. Stockton Ex Rel. Stockton
Citations
- 285 S.W.3d 517
- 2009 WL 606709
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the pre-2005 version of section 74.351(a) and holding that pre-suit service of an expert report on a potential defendant’s insurance carrier did not satis fy the statute
- applying the pre-2005 version of section 74.351(a) and holding that pre-suit service of an expert report on a potential defendant's insurance carrier did not satisfy the statute
- applying the pre-2005 version of section 74.351(a) and holding that pre-suit service of an expert report on a potential defendant's insurance carrier did not satisfy the statute
- applying the pre-2005 version of section 74.351(a) and holding that pre-suit service of an expert report on a potential defendant's insurance carrier did not satisfy the statute
- applying the pre-2005 version of section 74.351(a) and holding that pre-suit service of an expert report on a potential defendant's insurance carrier did not satisfy the statute
- \[F]iling [the expert report] with the petition does not comply with the statute.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Francis, Lang-Miers, Mazzant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.