Sax v. Votteler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the “purpose and basis for article 5.82 are legitimate” but nonetheless holding the restriction unreasonable as applied to minors
• recognizing that the “purpose and basis for article 5.82 are legitimate” but nonetheless holding the restriction unreasonable as applied to minors
• recognizing that the \purpose and basis for article 5.82 are legitimate\ but nonetheless holding the restriction unreasonable as applied to minors
• holding that a statute violates due process when it abolishes a right to bring a well-established common-law cause of action without providing a reasonable alternative
• concluding that the medical malpractice statute of limitations violated the state constitution's open-courts guarantee by \effectively abolish[ing] a minor's right to bring a well-established common law cause of action without providing a reasonable alternative\
• recognizing in as-applied open courts challenge that the “purpose and basis for article 5.82 are legitimate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).