Skip to main content

Mokkala v. Mead

Citations

  • 178 S.W.3d 66
  • 2005 WL 1377766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when plaintiff failed to file timely expert report, “the trial court was required to enter an order dismissing the claims against [defendants] with prejudice”
  • explaining that allowing plaintiff to restart 120-day deadline by nonsuiting claim and then later refiling suit would expand 120-day deadline to deadline imposed by statute of limitations
  • explaining that allowing plaintiff to restart 120- day deadline by nonsuiting claim and then later refiling suit would expand 120-day deadline to 8 deadline imposed by statute of limitations
  • addressing case in which no reports were served within 120 days of the filing of first lawsuit
  • ordering dismissal when plaintiff missed 120-day deadline by one day

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eva M. Guzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.