Skip to main content

Thompson v. Cooper

Citations

  • 290 P.3d 393
  • 2012 Alas. LEXIS 179
  • 2012 WL 6062095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that treating physicians may offer opinion on causation based on “subjectively applying their practical experience to the particular facts of [plaintiff’s] injury”
  • concluding “treating physicians were experience-based experts” and not subject to reliability and relevance requirements under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • acknowledging that causation could be inferred from symptoms beginning after an accident
  • holding failure to instruct jury on issue central to theory of case was erroneous
  • clarifying that medical expert witnesses’ opinion testimony on causation may be helpful to jury when opinions are formed by experts subjectively “applying their practical experience to the particular facts of [the] injury”
  • leaving the admissibility of evidence of Thompson's alleged drug abuse and FDA approval of Thompson's surgery \to the future discretion of the superior court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carpeneti, Fabe, Stowers, Winfree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.