· 4/25/1986
Hayes v. Xerox Corp.
Citations
- 718 P.2d 929
- 1986 Alas. LEXIS 424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the denial of a summary judgment motion did not constitute the law of the case
- concluding that lump sum award was not unreasonable even though it did not specify amount awarded for pain and suffering
- holding that an offer of judgment was not conditional upon joint acceptance and therefore was not invalid on those grounds
- ruling that an oral statement during closing argument by defense counsel in a civil negligence action— in which counsel conceded specific amounts of special damages — was counsel's opinion only and was not an admission
- holding that defense counsel’s estimate that compensable damages were $69,-000-$70,000 and concession that “I think he's been significantly injured. I think he has injury now. I think it may need treatment. We don't know for sure.” were not judicial admissions
- concluding defense attorney's statement during closing argument in a negligence case which conceded the plaintiff's injuries and sought to estimate the amount the jury should award was an expression of an opinion and not a judicial admission
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore, Rabinowitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.