Skip to main content
· 4/25/1986

Hayes v. Xerox Corp.

Citations

  • 718 P.2d 929
  • 1986 Alas. LEXIS 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the denial of a summary judgment motion did not constitute the law of the case
  • concluding that lump sum award was not unreasonable even though it did not specify amount awarded for pain and suffering
  • holding that an offer of judgment was not conditional upon joint acceptance and therefore was not invalid on those grounds
  • ruling that an oral statement during closing argument by defense counsel in a civil negligence action— in which counsel conceded specific amounts of special damages — was counsel's opinion only and was not an admission
  • holding that defense counsel’s estimate that compensable damages were $69,-000-$70,000 and concession that “I think he's been significantly injured. I think he has injury now. I think it may need treatment. We don't know for sure.” were not judicial admissions
  • concluding defense attorney's statement during closing argument in a negligence case which conceded the plaintiff's injuries and sought to estimate the amount the jury should award was an expression of an opinion and not a judicial admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore, Rabinowitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.