Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any error in granting summary judgment to one defendant was rendered harmless by jury’s finding after trial that defendant's purported agent was not liable for torts claimed
• finding any error in denying Rule 56(f) relief harmless where additional evidence would not raise a genuine issue of fact
• finding any error in denying Rule 56(f) relief harmless where additional evidence would not raise a genuine issue of fact
• holding superior court did not err when it granted movant summary judgment without granting nonmovant a Rule 56(f) continuance because this court's examination of document sought to be discovered revealed that it was \immaterial\ and \irrelevant\
• \A master is subject to liability for the torts of his servants commited while acting in the scope of their employment.\
• party preserved issue by requesting a ruling on her motion on three occasions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).