L.D.G., Inc. v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “a single damages cap calculated under section (b) should be applied to the aggregate non-economic damages awarded”
• affirming exclusion of evidence of intoxicated bar patron's role in fatally shooting decedent
• presuming without stating that oral grant of motion for directed verdict was proper
• \[The corporate veil may be pierced when a corporation is nothing more than a 'mere instrument' of a shareholder.\
• first quoting Elliott v. Brown, 569 P.2d 1323, 1326 (Alaska 1977); and then quoting Uchitel Co. v. Tel. Co., 646 P.2d 229, 235 (Alaska 1982)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).