David Farrell and Oliver J. Farrell v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he effect of the solicitations upon the recipients is a highly pertinent fact in determining whether the solicita tions are of the nature charged. The tendency of the form to mislead is shown by testimony that it did mislead.” (citations omitted)
• If “in [a] long and complicated trial some evidence may have gotten into the record” concerning loss that occurred after the defendant was no longer in control of the assets in question, there was not “prejudicial error sufficient to warrant a reversal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).