Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/23/2000
Medford v. State
Citations
- 13 S.W.3d 769
- 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21
- 2000 WL 202300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “ ‘[a]rrest’ is a technical term possessing a long, established history in the common law, and it would be inappropriate if jurors arbitrarily applied their personal definitions of arrest.”
- concluding that “arrest” had acquired technical meaning based on its established history in common law
- holding that “‘[a]rrest’ is a technical term possessing a long, established history in the common law, and it would be inappropriate if jurors arbitrarily applied their personal definitions of arrest”
- holding that “‘[a]rrest’ is a technical term possessing a long, established history in the common law, and it would be inappropriate if jurors arbitrarily applied their personal definitions of arrest.”
- providing that words not specially defined by the Legislature are to be understood as ordinary usage allows
- providing that words not specially defined by the Legislature are to be understood as ordinary usage allows
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mansfield, McCormick, Meyers, Price, Holland, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
172 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kirsch, Scott AlanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-01-25· cited 725×
- Grotti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-25· cited 678×
- Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-04-23· cited 572×
- Celis, Mauricio RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-05-15· cited 191×
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-11-18· cited 167×
- Arteaga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-07· cited 146×
- Clinton, KatherineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-12-14· cited 141×
- Tamez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-08-31· cited 109×
- State v. StroudArizona Supreme Court· 2005-01-07· cited 99×
- Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-08-31· cited 84×
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-12-16· cited 76×
- Thai Ngoc Nguyen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-07-01· cited 74×
- In the Matter of M.C.L.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-19· cited 56×
- Breckenridge v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2001-06-06· cited 55×
- Shipp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-02-02· cited 53×
- Nzewi v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-01-24· cited 52×
- Aschbacher v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2001-08-08· cited 44×
- Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-04-07· cited 43×
- Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-12-13· cited 40×
- Timothy Hutchison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-02-05· cited 39×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
- Amores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-09-18· cited 529×
- Vernon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-11-04· cited 493×
- United States v. Francisco Corral-Franco, Maria Guadalupe Corral-Franco, and Maria Aparis FrancoFifth Circuit· 1988-06-22· cited 79×
- Hardinge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-31· cited 72×
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-16· cited 68×
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-28· cited 35×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1949-04-13· cited 33×
- People v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1996-12-16· cited 27×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-04-20· cited 25×
- Shannon v. JonesTexas Supreme Court· 1890-03-04· cited 24×
- State v. NicholsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-06-30· cited 16×
- State v. NakoaHawaii Supreme Court· 1991-09-20· cited 15×
- State v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-05-18· cited 15×
- State v. SanchezArizona Supreme Court· 1985-06-18· cited 13×
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-13· cited 13×
- Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1932-03-23· cited 12×
- Dumaine v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1987-03-31· cited 8×
Other cases named Medford v. State
10 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Medford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-03-01· cited 14×
- Medford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-06-15· cited 8×
- Medford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-02-11· cited 7×
- Medford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-18
- Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1917-11-28
- Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1933-05-17
- Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1939-03-29
- Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1939-03-29
- Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1939-03-29
- Medford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1939-03-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.