Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 209 S.W.3d 268
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 9712
  • 2006 WL 3230275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that State’s use of six peremptory strikes to exclude 86% of eligible African-Americans constituted disproportionate use
  • reversing conviction because of disparate treatment and disproportionate use of strikes against African-Americans
  • sustaining Batson challenge based on disproportionate use of strikes and disparate-treatment analysis
  • prosecution struck six out of seven qualified African-American venire-members from panel of 38

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laura Carter Higley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.