Vargas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that State’s strike of five of six African-Americans on 36-member venire constituted disproportionate use of peremptory strikes
• holding that State’s strike of African-American legal assistant on basis that she was member of legal profession but failing to strike non-African-American paralegal constituted disparate treatment
• holding that State’s strike of five of six African-Americans on 36-member venire constituted disproportionate use of peremptory strikes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-11-09· cited 21×
• Robert Nathaniel Jones v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-10-01· cited 13×
• Milton Anthony Thomas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-11-09
• Walter Charles Gibson, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-10-06
• Walter Charles Gibson, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-08-05
• John Joseph Priest v. State
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-08-18

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vargas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-24· cited 235×
• Vargas v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1989-10-26· cited 12×