Skip to main content

Moore v. State

Citations

  • 265 S.W.3d 73
  • 2008 WL 1904021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that striking postal worker on basis of occupation was race-neutral
  • holding that striking postal worker on basis of occupation was race-neutral
  • defining “clearly erroneous” as requiring “a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”
  • stating that the court is in the best position to determine if the prosecutor was correct that the juror was inattentive, and noting that the defendant did not dispute the contention thereby resulting in the conclusion that the record supported it
  • stating that the court is in the best position to determine if the prosecutor was correct that the juror was inattentive, and noting that the defendant did not dispute the contention thereby resulting in the conclusion that the record supported it
  • stating that the court is in the best position to determine if the prosecutor was correct that the juror was inattentive, and noting that the defendant did not dispute the contention thereby resulting in the conclusion that the record supported it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sherry Radack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.