Skip to main content

Sutton v. State

Citations

  • 295 Ga. 350
  • 759 S.E.2d 846
  • 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 1534
  • 2014 WL 2702709
  • 2014 Ga. LEXIS 496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any Confrontation Clause violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, in part, because the erroneously admitted testimony was “cumulative of other admissible evidence placing [the] appellant in the house” where the murder occurred
  • “Bruton is not implicated where the statement does not facially incriminate appellant and only becomes incriminating when linked with other evidence introduced at trial.”
  • “To suggest that counsel should have obtained a deal is pure speculation which is insufficient to satisfy the prejudice prong of Strickland.”
  • trial court did not err in refusing to grant motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence demonstrating that firearms examiner who testified at trial fabricated data in another, unrelated case
  • trial court did not err in refusing to grant motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence demonstrating that firearms examiner who testified at trial fabricated data in another, unrelated case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.