Skip to main content

Dukes v. State

Citations

  • 457 S.E.2d 556
  • 265 Ga. 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that because appellant’s “due process right to notice of the charges brought against him was violated when he was tried on a theft charge that was not alleged in the indictment, his conviction for theft of the bank’s car must be reversed”
  • discussing application of due process analysis where trial court’s jury charge differs from indictment
  • potential for conviction of a crime not charged not implicated in the absence of evidence that defendant committed crime in such manner
  • “[w]ithout a limiting instruction[,] . . . the jury charge on unlawful appropriation violated due process”
  • “[w]ithout a limiting instruction . . . the jury charge on unlawful appropriation violated due process”
  • “[wjithout a limiting instruction . . . , the jury charge on unlawful appropriation violated due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.