Teseniar v. Spicer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing in part a superior court’s modification of a child support order because the court did not allow deductions for mandatory expenses enumerated in Rule 90.3(a)(1)
• analyzing whether Alaska court had subject matter jurisdiction under AS 25.25.205 to modify child support order
• explaining limited circumstances under which retroactive modification is statutorily permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).