Keating v. Traynor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pro se litigant’s informal request for intervention was timely when made within a few days of motion which litigant wished to challenge
• holding that court erred by adopting parties' original privately stipulated support amount instead of modifying support award based on current income in accordance with Rule 90.3
• remanding for specific findings after trial court modified support order as requested by CSED motion
• allowing custodial mother who had assigned right to support to CSED to intervene in CSED’s motion to modify prior support order because her interest was “inadequately represented” by agency
• \The trial court has a duty to make findings of fact sufficient to provide this court with a clear understanding of the basis of the award.\
• \[A] parent may not waive the requirements of Rule 90.3 by private agreement.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).