Telco Communications v. an Apple a Day

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that assertion of jurisdiction was supported by the fact that the effect of the challenged communication would be felt in Virginia
• holding that an element of the tortious act fit into the Krantz jurisdictional net because but for the use of internet service providers and users resident in Virginia, the publication requirement of the tort of defamation would not have been satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).