Skip to main content
· 3/23/2000

Rollin v. William v. Frankel & Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 996 P.2d 1254
  • 196 Ariz. 350
  • 317 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28
  • 2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Uberti based on absence of similar concerns about lack of any .available forum in United States
  • distinguishing Uberti based on absence of similar concerns about lack of any available forum in United States
  • \`The defendant must also have purposefully directed his conduct or activities at the forum State.'\
  • There was no general jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant who conducted $14 million in trades with broker-dealers in Arizona.
  • “ ‘The defendant must also have purposefully directed his conduct or activities at the forum State.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Druke, Flórez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.