· 3/23/2000
Rollin v. William v. Frankel & Co., Inc.
Citations
- 996 P.2d 1254
- 196 Ariz. 350
- 317 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 28
- 2000 Ariz. App. LEXIS 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing Uberti based on absence of similar concerns about lack of any .available forum in United States
- distinguishing Uberti based on absence of similar concerns about lack of any available forum in United States
- \`The defendant must also have purposefully directed his conduct or activities at the forum State.'\
- There was no general jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant who conducted $14 million in trades with broker-dealers in Arizona.
- “ ‘The defendant must also have purposefully directed his conduct or activities at the forum State.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pelander, Druke, Flórez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.