Pallas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is settled that a “well-founded fear’ is measured by a reasonable person standard, not a subjective standard.”
• telephone calls numbering fifty times in one day falls within the definition of harassment
• “Defendant was not prosecuted for following the victim. Instead he was prosecuted under the ‘harassment plus threat’ portion of the statute. In our view[,] defendant is without standing to challenge the statutory term ‘follows’ on grounds of vagueness.”
• upholding a similar stalking statute against vagueness challenges
• considering a constitutional challenge to the stalking statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).