Skip to main content
· 5/14/1996

Richard D. Stover v. O'COnnell Associates, Incorporated

Citations

  • 84 F.3d 132
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11253
  • 1996 WL 252367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “electronic connection . . . does not establish [a party’s] ‘presence’ in that jurisdiction”
  • noting that “Maryland courts have concluded that the state legislature intended to expand Maryland’s exercise of personal jurisdiction to the limits allowed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”
  • noting that “Maryland courts have concluded that the state legislature intended to expand Maryland’s exercise of personal jurisdiction to the limits allowed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment”
  • finding a defendant's \occasional telephonic requests for information from Maryland-based investigation services\ to be insufficient to subject the defendant to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland court
  • finding a defendant’s “occasional telephonic requests for information from Maryland-based investigation services” to be insufficient to subject the defendant to personal jurisdiction in a Maryland court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Niemeyer, Luttig

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.