Graduate Management Admission Council v. Raju

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant “did in fact ship materials in the United States”
• finding two product orders shipped to Virginia as insufficient to establish jurisdiction in that state
• finding Rule 4(k)(2) jurisdiction where “[t]he record clearly indicates that Raju directed his activity at the United States market and specifically targeted United States customers”
• finding Rule 4 (k) (2) jurisdiction when website had specific ordering instructions for U.S. customers
• “Rule 4(k)(2) was added in 1993 to deal with a gap in federal personal jurisdiction law in (Continued
• under substantially similar circumstances, court found that website was designed to attract a United States audience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).