Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “GAO decisions are not binding on this court, but we normally accord them deference in recognition of [the] GAO’s expertise in resolving contested procurement decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-07-02· cited 57×
• Westech International, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-11-06· cited 53×
• Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2009-07-24· cited 46×
• Arinc Engineering Services, LLC v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-06-07· cited 37×
• CSE Construction Co. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2003-08-26· cited 34×
• One Largo Metro, Llc v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2013-02-21· cited 16×
• Precision Images, LLC v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-11-15· cited 15×
• Bilfinger Berger AG Sede Secondaria Italiana v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-11-19· cited 13×
• Level 3 Communications, LLC v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2016-12-05· cited 11×
• Interspiro, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2006-09-25· cited 2×
• Nilson Van & Storage, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-08-12· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 1,104×
• Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1989-04-05· cited 433×
• Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1997-04-11· cited 126×
• Nickerson v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1996-05-20· cited 74×
• Bean Dredging Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-02-11· cited 59×
• North Carolina Division of Services for the Blind v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2002-08-02· cited 42×
• ACRA, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1999-07-14· cited 37×
• Toyo Menka Kaisha, Ltd. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-05-16· cited 32×
• IMS Services, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1995-02-14· cited 19×
• Interstate Rock Products, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2001-09-17· cited 19×
• Ryan Co. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1999-05-20· cited 15×
• ECDC Environmental, L.C. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1998-01-30· cited 9×

Other cases named Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2004-02-09· cited 6×