Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 12/5/2016

Level 3 Communications, LLC v. United States

Citations

  • 129 Fed. Cl. 487
  • 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1856
  • 2016 WL 7100549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding agency abused its discretion by failing to allow offeror to submit map in file format required by solicitation through clarification
  • determining that a “[s]ubmission of the [clearer map]” was a clarification because it “would not have varied the terms of Level 3’s offer” and was only to “confirm Level 3’s proposal”
  • giving weight to the fact that the offeror made representations in the proposal concerning the substance of the missing information
  • giving weight to the fact that the offeror made representations in the proposal concerning the substance of the missing information
  • giving weight to the fact that the offeror made representations in the proposal concerning the substance of the missing information
  • “In this case, as in BCPeabody, the CO had ‘virtually overwhelming cause’ to seek clarification from Level 3, because of its ‘significantly lower’ price.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Susan G. Braden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Level 3 Communications, LLC v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.