Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 392 S.W.3d 477
  • 2012 WL 3656358
  • 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, following a guilty plea, defendant‟s claim of retaliatory sentencing was cognizable in a Rule 24.035 proceeding
  • movant must show \something beyond the bare possibility that retaliation could have been a factor in sentencing\
  • relief lies if court actually factored defendant’s exercise of constitutional right into sentencing decision, even if other factors could have supported same sentence
  • to show sentencing court actually enhanced sentence based on defendant exercising his or her right to trial, record must include specific statement by court showing such, not merely generalized observations about failure to take responsibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Martin, Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.