Dauda Kohlheim v. State of Missouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that error regarding summary testimony connecting a phone number to the defendants was harmless
• explaining that the trial court’s admissibility rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion if a timely objection is made, and plain error if an objection is not preserved
• “It is generally recognized that tangible objects become admissible in evidence only when proof of their original acquisition and subsequent custody forges their connection with the accused and the criminal offense.” (emphasis added) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).