Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 552 S.W.3d 768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we presume “the sentencing court’s ‘experience and expertise enable the judge to consider appropriate sentencing factors and to disregard improper matters,’” (quoting State v. Donovan, 539 S.W.3d 57, 72 (Mo. App. E.D. 2017))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gaertner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.