Muhammad v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that implying necessary findings and conclusions would require the court to impermissibly engage in de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Watson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-02-27· cited 23×
• Muhammad v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-06-12· cited 13×
• Taylor v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-08-28· cited 13×
• Ivan Mitchell v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-02-07· cited 9×
• Jackson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-05-29· cited 5×
• Donald Henningfeld, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-12-23· cited 4×
• Charles W. Burnett v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-12-02· cited 3×
• Hougardy v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-06-27· cited 2×
• Smith v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-06-21· cited 1×
• Sneed v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-10-29· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-02-10· cited 120×
• Mitchell v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-05-23· cited 17×
• Belcher v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-12-22· cited 15×
• Melton v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-08-26· cited 12×
• Grimes v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-01-29· cited 11×