Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/11/1992

Taylor v. State

Citations

843 P.2d 682
252 Kan. 98
1992 Kan. LEXIS 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing and affirming rule of State v. McKinney, 221 Kan. 691, 694-95, 561 P.2d 432 [1977], that inquiry is \unnecessary and inappropriate\
recognizing and affirming rule of State v. McKinney, 221 Kan. 691, 694-95, 561 P.2d 432 [1977], that inquiry is \unnecessary and inappropriate\
affirming the denial of movant’s claim that he was denied the right to testify due to ineffective assistance of counsel based on a findings of fact and conclusions of law standard
discussing a habeas petitioner's contention that he was \denied his constitutional right to testify in his own behalf through ineffective assistance of counsel\
finding it is the duty of the trial court to pass on the credibility of the witnesses
trial courts need not inquire into the defendants' waiver of the right to testify at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herd, Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.