Skip to main content

Graham v. State

Citations

  • 952 P.2d 1266
  • 263 Kan. 742
  • 1998 Kan. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court’s findings were not supported by substantial competent evidence, reversing the district court’s order for a new trial, and remanding for a hearing on petitioner’s sentence
  • applying substantial evidence standard to findings on an ineffective assistance of counsel determination
  • admission of prior conviction which is constitutionally infirm under Sixth Amendment standards is inherently prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.