Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 939 N.E.2d 1132
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 15
  • 2011 WL 63078

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner could not use Post-Conviction Rule 2(1) “as a vehicle for filing a belated notice of appeal from his post-conviction relief proceeding”
  • holding that the petitioner could not use Post-Conviction Rule 2(1) “as a vehicle for filing a belated notice of appeal from his post-conviction relief proceeding”
  • concluding that— because Taylor had demonstrated he was entitled to relief under Indiana Trial Rule 72(E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Riley, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.