Skip to main content
· 11/27/1996

Gable v. Curtis

Citations

  • 673 N.E.2d 805
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 1599
  • 1996 WL 689806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that large number of phone calls lacking obscenity or threatened violence, whether or not justified, was not sufficiently outrageous to state a cause of action
  • no outrageous conduct where contractor’s wife phoned purchaser seven times in one hour, screaming, threatening to repossess home and to come over, and stating repeatedly that the purchasers “would pay”
  • T.R. 72(E) extension of time to file appeal affirmed where party provided the clerk of court with her correct address as required under T.R. 3.1(E
  • creditor called debtor seven times in an hour screaming and threatening to repossess debtor’s home, and warning that debtors “would pay”
  • Trial Rule 72(E) relief appropriate where CCS showed party had provided clerk new address and notice sent to old address had been 5 returned to clerk as insufficiently addressed
  • no outrageous conduct where contractor’s wife phoned purchaser seven times in one hour, screaming, threatening to repossess home and to come over, and stating repeatedly that the purchasers “would pay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Hoffman, Barteau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.