Skip to main content
· 10/19/1987

Markle v. Indiana State Teachers Ass'n

Citations

  • 514 N.E.2d 612
  • 1987 Ind. LEXIS 1209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the docket book is clear on its face that notice was mailed, then such a 3 challenge is precluded.”
  • “If the docket book is clear on its face that notice was mailed, then such a challenge is precluded.”
  • Trial Rule 72(E) relief appropriate where mailing of notice was evidenced in docket only by handwritten note with names of attorneys
  • the trial court ruled on two separate motions, but the movants received a copy of only one order in the mail, and the evidence could support the conclusion that copies of both orders had not been mailed to the movants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Givan, Pivarnik, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.