Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 640 So. 2d 1127
  • 1994 WL 201553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a video was needlessly repetitive and therefore inadmissible because it depicted the same scenes as other admitted photographs; the court added that “we would not reverse this cause based solely on the cumulative photographic evidence”
  • “Improper prosecutorial comment is subject to a harmless error analysis, and will give rise to reversal of a conviction only if the comment is so prejudicial that it vitiates the entire trial.”
  • standard of review for ruling on prosecutorial comments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joanos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.