Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 884 S.E.2d 346
  • 315 Ga. 630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an officer’s opinion of the evidence did not violate OCGA § 24-7-704 because it was lay opinion
  • “It is not the function of this Court to cull the record for a party to find alleged errors or to form arguments on the appellant’s behalf.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “Even to the extent there was conflicting evidence in the record about [whether counsel considered the psychologist’s re- ports], the trial court was authorized to credit trial counsel’s tes- timony.”
  • “It is not the function of this Court to cull the record for a party to find alleged errors or to form 8 arguments on the appellant’s behalf.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.