Skip to main content

Tate v. State

Citations

  • 136 So. 3d 624
  • 2013 WL 5951702
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court’s failure to inform the jury of the possibility of a readback of the testimony was not fundamental error
  • stating that the appellant did not preserve his challenge to the trial court’s answer to the jury’s question where he did not object and actually agreed to the court’s response

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Morris, Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.