Sebastiano v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding common scheme or course of conduct where defendant enticed victim into series of fraudulent real estate purchases and the defendant was found guilty of organized fraud
• “[I]ntent, being a state of mind, is rarely if ever susceptible of direct proof. Almost inevitably, as here, it must be shown solely by circumstantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-09· cited 9×
• Tate v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-08· cited 3×
• Izquierdo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-28· cited 2×
• SEBASTIANO v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-14
• DEMETRIUS ELLIOT v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-18
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. ILAN TIMIANSKI
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-01-22
• Alvaro Juan Silva v. The State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-05-08

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Law
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
• Pizzo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 112×
• Kirby v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-10-09· cited 28×
• Parker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-03· cited 20×
• Sewall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-20· cited 15×
• Rosen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-08· cited 13×
• Grover v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-19· cited 13×
• Method v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-01· cited 7×
• State v. Davis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-19· cited 1×