Manuel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]aking the evidence in a light most favorable to the State, intent can be inferred from the circumstances of the incident.”
• “[T]aking the evidence in a light most favorable to the State, intent can be inferred from the circumstances of the incident.”
• noting that “intent is usually proven through inference”
• “[D]irect evidence of intent is rare, and intent is usually proven through inference . . . .”
• “Because direct evidence of intent is rare, and intent is usually proven through inference, ‘a trial court should rarely, if ever, grant a motion for judgment of acquittal on the issue of intent.’”
• “[D]irect evidence of intent is rare, and intent is usually proven through inference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-07· cited 12×
• Rocker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-30· cited 8×
• DEBBIE O'FLAHERTY-LEWIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-01· cited 6×
• Bartee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-17· cited 4×
• Keshon Brainard Williams v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-28· cited 3×
• Tate v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-08· cited 3×
• Marlon Edgardo Lara-Castillo v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-18· cited 2×
• Courtney S. Brown v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-17· cited 1×
• Kacy Danielle Crenshaw v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-17
• Dorsey v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-05