S.D. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Intent to commit a battery must be determined by the circumstances surrounding the touching or striking of the victim.”
• “Intent to commit a battery must be determined by the circumstances surrounding the touching or striking of the victim.”
• \Intent to commit a battery must be determined by the circumstances surrounding the touching or striking of the victim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pinkney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-18· cited 11×
• N.H.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-25· cited 8×
• BONGE v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-16· cited 3×
• Fey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-27· cited 3×
• Tate v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-08· cited 3×
• W.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-21· cited 1×
• A.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-07· cited 1×
• WM v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-21
• Diaz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-16
• SD v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-01
• NHM v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-25
• D.C., a child v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-20
• D.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-05-20
• A.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pagan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
• Mohansingh v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-06· cited 9×
• C.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-20· cited 9×
• C.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-02· cited 4×